Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0361620080430010072
Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2008 Volume.43 No. 1 p.72 ~ p.77
Clinical Outcome after Septic versus Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Ha Chul-Won

Moon Jeong-Seok
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods: This study compared the clinical and radiographic results of 12 septic and 10 aseptic revisions. All septic revisions were treated with two-stage reimplantation using an articulating cement spacer. The range of motion, Knee Society score, WOMAC score, and radiographic results of the American Knee Society were assessed.

Results: The preoperative data, which included the average range of motion, Knee Society score, WOMAC score and femoro-tibial angle, were similar in both groups. At the final follow-up, the average range of motion was similar in the two groups: 102.5o in the septic revisions, and 114.5o in the aseptic revisions (p=0.070). In addition, the Knee Society score, WOMAC score and femoro-tibial angle were similar in both groups. There was no loosening or failure of either component observed in any case. A patellar tendon rupture was observed in one septic revision after surgery.

Conclusion: Two-stage reimplantation using an articulating cement spacer in septic revisions could achieve functional results that are compatible to aseptic revisions.
KEYWORD
Septic, Aseptic, Revision, Total knee arthroplasty
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø